Vulnerability scanning services
Vulnerability scanning services
Turn scan results into prioritized findings, remediation guidance, and evidence your team can act on.
Where vulnerability scanning fits best
Use scanning when your team needs a clear view of known vulnerabilities and the evidence to act on them.
Customer Evidence Requests
A customer security questionnaire asks for vulnerability management evidence.No Regular Scan Cadence
Public-facing systems, APIs, cloud assets, or internal networks have no regular scan cadence.Unprioritized Scan Findings
A previous scan produced too many findings, but no clear priority, owner, or next action.ISO/NIS2 Evidence Readiness
Your team is preparing for ISO/NIS2-related evidence requests and needs scan records with follow-up status.
A scan report is not a remediation plan
Most scan outputs fail when findings remain unprioritized, unowned, or impossible to evidence later.
| Problem | Operational effect | What good scanning produces |
|---|---|---|
| Too many findings | Security and IT teams receive a long list without enough context. | Findings need priority, not just severity labels. |
| No clear owner | Tickets sit between infrastructure, application, and cloud teams. | Remediation needs ownership and next actions. |
| No closure evidence | Fixes are made but not documented in a way buyers or auditors can review. | Closure evidence must be part of the output. |
| No repeatable cadence | New releases and cloud changes create fresh exposure between checks. | Scanning works best as a defined cadence. |
A useful scan narrows the question from “what is exposed?” to “what should we fix first, who owns it, and what evidence proves closure?”
From scan scope to closure evidence
Define scan scope
We align the systems, environments, exclusions, and scan cadence before testing starts. Scope can include infrastructure, web applications, internal networks, cloud environments, and APIs.
Prioritize findings
Findings are reviewed and organized by practical risk context, not only technical severity. Your team sees what should be handled first and why.
Support evidence trail
The output gives technical teams remediation guidance and leadership a summary view. Optional retest notes can support closure when scoped separately.
Share the systems in scope, the evidence you need, and whether this is a one-off scan or recurring cadence.
What your team receives
Each output is written to support action, ownership, and later security review.
-
Vulnerability report
A structured report of identified vulnerabilities, affected assets, severity, and supporting technical details.
Each finding includes enough context for your team to understand what was detected, where it appears, and why it matters for the environment being reviewed.
-
Prioritized finding list
A focused view of the findings that should be addressed first, based on severity, exposure, and practical risk context.
This helps internal teams separate urgent remediation from lower-priority issues and plan the work in a more controlled order.
-
Remediation guidance
Clear recommended actions for each relevant finding, written for internal owners or delivery teams responsible for resolving the issue.
Guidance focuses on what needs to change and what should be verified afterwards, so findings can move from report to remediation.
-
Executive summary
A concise overview of the scan scope, key findings, overall risk picture, and the areas that need the most attention.
It gives technical and non-technical stakeholders a shared view of what was found, what matters most, and what should happen next.
-
Evidence pack
Supporting scan records and finding evidence that help document what was identified during the assessment.
The pack can support internal review, remediation tracking, and later customer or security discussions where evidence of the assessment is required.
-
Optional retest notes
Where retesting is scoped separately, remediated findings can be checked again to confirm whether the identified issue has been resolved.
Retest notes provide closure evidence for verified fixes and help distinguish completed remediation from findings that still require attention.
Compare cadences
Choose the scan model that matches your risk and evidence needs.
| Area | One-off | Recurring | Managed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Change or release check | Regular exposure review | Ongoing ownership cadence |
| Cadence | Single agreed scope | Scheduled scans | Scheduled scans plus review |
| Finding review | Severity summary | Trend and priority view | Priority, owner, next action |
| Guidance | Included | Included | Included with follow-up |
| Evidence | Scan report | Scan history | Report plus closure notes |
| Retest | Optional | Optional | Optional and scoped |
Our verified credentials
Customer success is our priority
A pentest that went beyond the surface
A new authentication layer needed deeper validation. Sunbytes combined manual and automated grey-box testing to uncover and classify vulnerabilities, then guided the team through the findings and remediation options.
Grey-box pentest · SOC 2 & ISO-aligned reporting · 9 findings classified
From concept to a working prototype in 3 sprints
SandGrain needed to turn its post-quantum authentication concept into a secure, scalable cloud platform without compromising reliability. Sunbytes assembled a seven-person multidisciplinary team and delivered a functional prototype in three sprints.
15 releases · 3,380 test cases · 1,777 automated tests
Six weeks from security testing to launch readiness
Methodemeter was preparing to launch a digital education platform without dedicated in-house security expertise. Sunbytes ran a black-box pentest, guided remediation, and aligned testing with GDPR, NIS2 and ISO 27001.
6-week test-to-fix cycle · GDPR, NIS2, ISO 27001 · Launched clean
Web, API and mobile tested before an IPO security audit
C2C needed its production product tested across web, API, iOS and Android before an IPO security audit. Sunbytes ranked each finding and provided remediation guidance the team could act on.
Web, API, iOS & Android · All identified findings remediated · 5.0 Clutch review
Testimonials
“Sunbytes started to assemble the team at their own risk even before we had our seed investment signed. When that happened we could make a flying start.”
“We were impressed by the vulnerabilities that were discovered. We can tell that the pentesters dug deep to discover the vulnerabilities, and not just a surface scan.”
“Sunbytes’ thorough approach uncovered risks we’d never even considered and opened my eyes to just how important it is to secure our platform from day one.”
“Sunbytes provided practical, prioritized remediation guidance that our team could act on immediately.”
Why teams choose Sunbytes
A Netherlands-led security partner that turns scanning output into clear remediation and evidence workflows.
Secure-by-design delivery context
Sunbytes understands how vulnerabilities affect real delivery environments, so findings are written for teams that need to fix them.
ISO 27001-certified ISMS
Client information and scan evidence are handled through an ISO 27001-certified information security management system.
Netherlands-led communication
Dutch-led coordination helps European teams align scope, priority, and reporting without unclear handoffs.
Technical and executive reporting
Technical owners get finding detail, while leadership gets a summary view of exposure, priority, and next steps.
Remediation-aware workflow
Findings are prioritized for action, with guidance and optional retest notes to support closure where scoped.
Connected Secure services
When scan results point to deeper validation or readiness work, Sunbytes can route the next step without changing partner context.
Security evidence backed by proven delivery discipline
Secure handling, clear reporting, and proven delivery discipline support European teams that need evidence they can act on
-
15+
Years of experience -
300+
Projects delivered -
20+
Countries
Ready to make scan results actionable?
Share your target systems, constraints, timing, and evidence needs. Sunbytes will help define the right scan cadence and output, with optional retesting or closure evidence scoped separately.
