Person-focused pay is the model that shifts compensation from what a role requires to what an individual can actually do. This article explains what it is, the person-focused pay advantages and disadvantages you need to weigh, and how to apply it in practice, including specific considerations for companies building teams in Vietnam.
TL;DR
- Person-focused pay rewards employees for skills and competencies they develop, not the title they hold.
- There are four models: stair-step, skills block, job point accrual, and cross-departmental. Each suits a different team structure.
- The main benefits are retention and flexibility. The main risks are rising wage costs and assessment bias.
What is Person-Focused Pay?
“Person-focused pay is a compensation strategy that rewards employees based on the skills, knowledge, and competencies they develop and demonstrate, rather than the title they hold or the specific tasks their role requires.”
It is also referred to as person-based pay, skill-based pay, or competency-based pay, depending on which element is being emphasized.
In practice, this means two employees in the same role may earn different salaries based on the depth and breadth of their verified capabilities. The more they develop, the more they earn, independent of whether a promotion is available.
Main elements of competency-based pay
A competency-based pay structure is built around three core inputs that together determine where an employee sits on the pay scale.
- Skills: Technical and practical capabilities the employee can demonstrate on the job
- Knowledge: Domain-specific understanding accumulated through experience and formal learning
- Behavioral competencies: Broader qualities such as problem-solving, communication, and cross-functional collaboration that contribute to organizational outcomes
Person-focused pay vs job based pay
The person-focused pay vs job based pay distinction comes down to what the compensation system is measuring.
| Factor | Job-Based Pay | Person-Focused Pay |
|---|---|---|
| Pay basis | Job title and role requirements | Individual skills and competency level |
| Pay increases | Promotion or annual review | Verified skill acquisition |
| Flexibility | Low – tied to position | High – tied to the person |
| Best suited for | Stable, defined roles | Dynamic, learning-focused teams |
| Employee motivation | To secure promotion | To develop capabilities |
| Fairness perception | Clear but rigid | Fair if criteria are transparent |
Person-focused pay vs performance based pay
These models are often confused, but they measure different things.
Performance-based pay rewards employees for what they deliver within a specific period. This typically includes outcomes such as hitting sales targets or completing defined projects.
Person-focused pay, on the other hand, rewards employees for their capabilities. It reflects what an individual is able to do, regardless of their current output.
A related comparison is skill-based pay vs competency based pay. Skill-based pay focuses primarily on technical, demonstrable abilities. Competency-based pay is broader and includes behavioral attributes such as leadership, communication, and cross-functional judgment.
When building or reviewing your pay structure, understanding how the payroll processing implications differ between these models is essential. Competency-level changes require payroll adjustments that are triggered by assessment outcomes rather than calendar dates.
The Four Models of Person-Focused Pay
Four distinct models exist, each suited to a different organizational context. Choosing the right one depends on how roles are structured, how skills build on each other, and how much flexibility the business needs.
| Model | Definitions | Best Suited For | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Stair-Step Model | Roles are structured into hierarchical levels with defined skills and pay; employees progress by mastering the next level. | – Structured career paths (junior → senior → lead)- Clearly defined progression- Organizations prioritizing simplicity | – Easy to understand- Simple to administer- Clear promotion criteria | – Rigid structure- Limited recognition for non-linear skill growth |
| 2. Skills Block Model | Competencies are grouped into independent blocks; employees complete blocks in any order and earn pay increases for each. | – Cross-functional teams- Diverse skill requirements- Flexible career paths | – Encourages lateral developmen- Faster progression for high performers- Adaptable to business needs | – Requires clear skill definition- Needs complex administration and tracking system |
| 3. Job Point Accrual Model | Skills and certifications are assigned points; employees accumulate points, and pay is based on total score. | – Technical or specialized environments- Organizations needing granular skill tracking | – Highly flexible- Recognizes niche competencie- Supports personalized development | – Complex to manage- lead to competition for high-point roles |
| 4. Cross-Departmental Model | Employees are rewarded for developing capabilities across functions; pay increases with demonstrated effectiveness beyond the core role. | – Lean organizations- Teams needing flexibility- Dynamic workload environments | – Improves organizational resilience- Reduces single-role dependency- Enables flexible staffing | – Higher training investment- Risk of underutilized skills |
When expanding to Vietnam, these models must align with local employment structures.
- Competency changes can impact job classification
- Documentation must be updated accordingly
- Misalignment may create reclassification risks
Working with a partner that handles labor mangement ensures that competency-based adjustments are properly documented and compliant with Vietnamese labor law.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Person-Focused Pay
Understanding person focused pay advantages and disadvantages before committing to implementation is critical. The model creates genuine value, but only in organizations that are willing to invest in the governance infrastructure it requires.
Advantages
Person-focused pay benefits both employers and employees through three key outcomes:
Greater workforce flexibility and scalability
Employees are rewarded based on the range of skills they possess rather than a single role, allowing organizations to redeploy talent more quickly during demand shifts or restructuring. This reduces reliance on fixed job structures and increases overall workforce flexibility.
Improved retention and engagement
Employees benefit from clear earning growth without needing a formal promotion, which reduces the pressure to leave in search of career progression. This approach signals a long-term investment in development and is particularly effective in retaining mid-career, high-potential talent.
Research from SHRM Compensation shows that skill-based pay models can reduce voluntary turnover, especially among high performers, by addressing stalled career growth.
Stronger alignment with training investment
When skills are directly linked to pay, employees are more motivated to develop new capabilities, which improves the return on learning and development programs and ensures workforce capabilities remain aligned with business strategy.
Uncapped earning potential and career progression
Employees are not limited by role availability or promotion cycles. They can increase their income by developing new competencies, removing bottlenecks in traditional career paths and giving more control over their progression.
Clear career progression and earning potential
Employees are not limited by role availability or promotion cycles. They can increase their income by developing new competencies, while a transparent framework helps them understand exactly what is required to progress. This also improves adaptability and job security in changing work environments
Despite its advantages, person-focused pay introduces several risks that must be actively managed.
H3:Disadvantages
Governance and assessment challenges
Without clear criteria and standardized evaluation processes, competency assessments can become inconsistent, leading to perceived unfairness and reduced employee trust. This directly impacts motivation and can undermine the effectiveness of the system.
Cost growth and administrative complexity
As employees accumulate competencies, salaries increase over time, creating continuous upward wage pressure that is less predictable than traditional job-based pay. Organizations may also face higher administrative overhead and difficulty assigning consistent monetary value to specific skills.
Governance and assessment challenges
Without clear criteria and standardized evaluation processes, competency assessments can become inconsistent, leading to perceived unfairness. Weak governance can undermine trust in the system and reduce its effectiveness.
Skill obsolescence and misalignment risk
Employees may plateau after reaching higher competency levels, while frameworks can become outdated if not aligned with evolving business needs. In some cases, not all capabilities should be built internally, and organizations need to assess when external expertise is more effective.
Reviewing outsourcing vs offshoring considerations helps determine the most effective balance between internal capability building and external expertise.
How to implement a Person Focused Pay System (5 Steps)
Implementation is where most person-focused pay initiatives succeed or fail. The framework design is the visible part.
Step 1. Identify the skills and competencies that matter most
Start from business strategy rather than HR theory. The competencies linked to pay should reflect how the organization competes, delivers value, and adapts over time. This means identifying what truly separates high performers from average ones, prioritizing critical roles, and keeping each job family focused with roughly 8 to 15 core competencies
When the list becomes too long, it creates unnecessary complexity. A tighter framework makes the system easier to understand and execute.
Step 2. Build your competency framework and pay tiers
Each competency needs to be defined across clear proficiency levels, with specific behavioral indicators that managers can consistently interpret. Alignment across managers is essential to avoid subjective evaluations.
These levels should then be directly linked to pay tiers. In many organizations, especially in tech and professional services, moving up a level typically translates into a 5-10% salary increase. The biggest risk at this stage is unclear definitions, which often lead to inconsistent assessments and eventually disputes.
Step 3. Design the assessment and certification process
The credibility of the entire system depends on how well assessments are conducted. A robust approach usually combines multiple inputs, such as manager evaluations, peer feedback, and objective evidence like certifications or work outputs.
Companies typically run assessments once or twice a year. While more frequent reviews can improve accuracy, they also increase the administrative workload, so there is always a balance to manage.
Step 4. Align the pay structure with your existing payroll system
Unlike traditional salary models, competency-based pay does not follow fixed review cycles. Adjustments can happen at any point once an assessment is completed, which requires payroll systems to handle off-cycle changes.
For companies operating in Vietnam, outsourcing payroll to a local specialist ensures that mid-year salary adjustments triggered by competency assessments are processed accurately, reported correctly to tax authorities, and reflected properly in SHUI contributions.
Step 5. Communicate the system and train managers
The model’s success depends heavily on how well managers apply it and how clearly it is communicated. Managers need to be trained to evaluate employees fairly, apply consistent scoring criteria, and handle expectation gaps.
At the same time, employees should clearly understand which competencies are being assessed, how the evaluation process works, and how their pay progression is determined.
Before launching, ensure contracts and policies comply with Vietnamese payroll requirements. Under the Labor Code 2019, any documented pay progression becomes a legally binding obligation once in an employment agreement.
Person-Focused Pay in Vietnam: What Global Companies Should Know
Applying person-focused pay in Vietnam is feasible but requires adaptation. The market, especially in tech and professional services, responds well to competency-based growth. However, local legal and administrative requirements differ significantly from Western practices.
Labor Code Compliance for Competency-Based Salary Structures
Vietnam’s Labor Code 2019 requires salary structures to be formalized and registered with authorities. Competency-based pay tiers must be documented within this framework. Informal or undocumented arrangements create legal risk in disputes.
SHUI Contributions and Competency-Based Pay
SHUI contributions are calculated based on the salary stated in the employment contract. When competency-based increases occur, contracts must be updated accordingly. Failure to do so can lead to back payments and regulatory penalties.
Assessment Documentation and Employment Records
All competency assessments that trigger pay changes must be documented and signed. These records serve as legal evidence in case of disputes. Consistent documentation is essential for compliance, not just internal governance.
Operational Support for Compliance
For companies without a local entity, managing these requirements can be complex. Sunbytes provides payroll service in Vietnam, ensuring a person-focused pay system correctly from day one, including salary structure registration, SHUI management, and employment contract administration.
How Sunbytes Applies Payroll Service Best Practices to Your Operations
By combining structured processes, local regulatory expertise, and scalable systems, Sunbytes ensures payroll is accurate, compliant, and aligned with your workforce strategy. Every payroll cycle is managed with strict controls, clear documentation, and consistency, ensuring salaries, taxes, and statutory contributions are processed correctly across all scenarios.
With Sunbytes, organizations do not just implement a pay model. They operate a structured, compliant, and scalable compensation system that supports long-term workforce stability in Vietnam.
Why Sunbytes?
Sunbytes is a Dutch technology company headquartered in the Netherlands with a strong presence in Vietnam, supporting global businesses for over 15 years in scaling teams while maintaining strong operational and compliance standards.
Our workforce capabilities are built on three core service pillars:
- Digital Transformation Solutions – Supporting end-to-end product development and modernization, with deep understanding of how high-performing teams are structured
- Cyber Security Solutions – Embedding a security-first mindset to ensure growing teams maintain strong risk control and compliance
- Accelerate Workforce Solutions – Enabling companies to recruit and scale high-performing teams in Vietnam with the right talent fit and faster onboarding
FAQs
Yes. Most organizations combine both models to balance structure and flexibility. Job-based pay sets the salary range, while person-focused pay adjusts within that range based on competency. This allows companies to reward development without losing control over pay structure.
Use multiple assessment methods. Combining manager evaluation, peer review, and objective evidence such as certifications or work samples reduces bias. Calibration across managers further improves consistency and fairness.
No. It works best in knowledge-intensive industries where skills are measurable and critical to performance. In standardized or low-margin environments, the complexity may outweigh the benefits. Suitability depends more on role complexity than team size.
For example, a Vietnam-based tech team using a skills block model to reward engineers for completing cloud and security certifications is a strong fit. By contrast, a factory production line with fixed, repetitive tasks would typically benefit more from a job-based pay structure.
Competency frameworks and pay tiers should be reviewed annually to stay aligned with business and market changes. Individual assessments are typically conducted semi-annually. This creates a consistent development and evaluation cycle.
Person-focused pay works best in environments where skills drive performance and roles are flexible or evolving. It supports continuous learning, cross-functional work, and talent retention through clear skill-based progression, especially when skills can be reliably defined and assessed.
Let’s start with Sunbytes
Let us know your requirements for the team and we will contact you right away.
